5 People In Today’s Economy That Need To STFU
If you’ve been watching the news lately, the economy might look pretty shaky right now. The stock market is dropping, businesses are looking for government handouts, and the President is preaching doom and gloom for us all. It’s as if a buyer’s market has become a bad thing because golden parachutes for those at the top suddenly aren’t large enough to blot out the sun from the average man on the street.
No one can predict the future, but if I’ve learned one thing in my life, it’s that the future is rarely as ominous as people make it out to be. Here are 5 types of people that I’d really offer a free, hot cup of STFU to when it comes to listening to their views on what the economy is and isn’t.
1. People Who Freak Out Every Time The Stock Market Drops
If you’re a current retiree who has to sell shares from your retirement fund to make ends meet, you are allowed to freak out a little because the value of your retirement fund can have a direct effect on your lifestyle. Most people who I hear moaning and groaning the loudest about their funds dropping in value aren’t retirees, though. They’re generally people who are still buying into their retirement funds.
Why is it that people look at low prices as being a good thing everywhere that they shop except the stock market? How does that make sense? If you’re buying into your retirement fund, low prices are actually a good thing. Rule number one of how to make money in finance isn’t “buy high, sell higher”. It’s “buy low, sell high”. When stock prices are down, you should be giddily buying, not bitching that you can’t buy at a higher price. A low price means you can buy more shares and have a potentially higher profit margin when you sell those shares after you retire.
So, if you’re not currently retired, do us all a favor and stop sighing and complaining about how much you’ve “lost” in the stock market. The fact is, you haven’t lost anything until you sell at a lower price than you bought at. If you aren’t selling, then you aren’t losing. Got it? Now, get out there and start buying because there is a fire sale going on right now, and supplying a steady stream of coke and hookers to that retirement home in your golden years is not going to be cheap.
2. People Who Picket To Stop Foreclosures
I understand that things can go wrong in life, and if picketing is your way of using the media to refinance your mortgage, good for you for working the system. Between you and me though, let’s not pretend that it’s a mortgage company’s fault that you bit off more than you can chew. When you sign mortgage papers, they have a page that shows you your exact payment for the length of the loan. If that number is more than you can afford, or even close to what you can afford, you shouldn’t be buying the fucking house. Get something cheaper and fix it up, or wait until the market tanks and is full of dirt cheap properties.
The mortgage company didn’t trick you by pre-approving you for a bigger loan than you could afford. You’re not stupid. If a mortgage company told you that you could afford a $4.2 million dollar house, would you head over to Beverly Hills to start looking, or would you think they’re nuts and look for a house that fits into your budget? You look for one that fits in your budget. Trust me, I know what it’s like to go broke because of extenuating circumstances, but maintaining personal responsibility when the chips are down builds strength and character, which are getting harder and harder to find these days.
3. People Who Spread Fear
I’m not a Republican or a Democrat, and I see most of the antics of politicians as stupid theatrical tricks worthy of being ignored. When the President went on television and told the nation we were economically doomed, I got really irritated because there are a lot of smart people in the White House who know that the biggest thing an economy requires to move forward is consumer confidence. If you intentionally panic people (which is what I see as the intention of the message), then you undermine people’s confidence and drive the economy down.
If people are comfortable, they spend. If they are nervous, they spend less. If they are panicked, they spend nothing and start hoarding. That’s when you have bank runs that feed the panic and drive the economy under. For the President of the United States to act like there is a 700 billion dollar emergency ready take down the nation was a bad parlor trick whose only aim was to drive the economy into the ground. While there are a lot of motives for this, few are altruistic or in the interest of the common good.
4. People Who Want to Prop Up Failures
Purchasing a 700 billion dollar stake in companies that are failing was a ridiculous idea from the start and everyone knew it. Companies that make bad decisions should fail or be bought out by stronger companies. That’s how the free market economy works. If Congress comes to the rescue, then there is incentive for the companies to make the same mistake again because they will never pay the price for their mistakes.
But, without the bailout, loans will dry up! All the money in those Morgan Stanley funds will be gone I tell you! We’re doomed? AaAAaaAAaa! Ugh. Shut up and calm down. If you want to bet that the company that manages your retirement fund is going go out of business, then sell out, take the hit, and invest that money elsewhere. You’ll lose some of your money and retain your peace of mind. Then, a few years from now, you can look back and imagine all the money you would have made if you didn’t freak out and base a major financial decisions on raw fear. My feeling is that before a large company like Morgan Stanley starts to goes under, a larger company will step in and absorb them. All those accounts would move to the new company and everything will be business as usual under a new name.
If Morgan Stanley and other big companies end up in that situation because of an over reliance on mortgage backed securities, that’s tough. If I go throwing my money away at the casino, Morgan Stanley isn’t going to drop by and hand me wads of cash to cover my debts, so I ask them for the same consideration. If a company screws the pooch with some bad financial decisions, they can’t knock on the taxpayer’s door for a handout. That’s not the taxpayer’s responsibility in a free market economy.
5. People Who Forget History
Let’s have a quick history lesson. In the 1980’s, there were specialized banks called Savings & Loans that used deposit accounts to fund mortgages. Thanks to deregulation in the quest for profit, the S&L’s played around heavily in real estate speculation. They wrote out high risk loans to capitalize on the double digit interest rates (despite some of them being completely insolvent), and for a long time, the government pretended not to notice. When the frenzy came to a halt, there was not only a glut of real estate on the market, but a lot of people were simply walking away from their mortgages because they were paying so much more than their houses were worth.
The S&L’s went into a tailspin and not only bankrupt the FSLIC (a S&L version of the FDIC), but required a $125 billion bailout from taxpayers. In the middle of all this (1987), the stock market crashed the hardest since the Great Depression. Most people had to kill and eat their neighbors to survive because society came to a grinding halt. I, myself, had to fight in Thunderdome to get some much needed gasoline for my all-terrain death buggy. Wait, scratch that last part. My memory is a little fuzzy, so that may have been from a movie I saw. Actually, despite the state of the economy, people went on as usual, and those who went against the dark financial forecasts and sunk their money into a house after everything crashed made their money back a number of times over when the market corrected itself.
Conclusion
Yes, real estate is typically the single largest asset people own, so it can seem like it would be a major effect of the economy as a whole. In reality, it’s not as big as you’d think. Real Estate makes up less than 5% of GDP, so the economy is not going to grind to a halt if the housing market bottoms out. The most important factor in keeping the economy strong is consumer confidence and that starts with all of us. I’m not saying to stick your head into the sand and pretend that economic downturns don’t happen, but they can be weathered and profited from with the right strategies. To profit in any financial climate, all you have to do is see opportunity where others see fear, do the opposite of what everyone else is doing, and of course, “buy low, sell high”.
Share, Bookmark, or E-Mail This Article
October 1st, 2008 at 10:54 am
Amen x infinity. I’m sending this around to all my freaked out friends and relatives (including my freaked out husband). Notice that the bailout didn’t happen right away and WE’RE ALL STILL HERE and the sky hasn’t fallen.
Still, I wouldn’t mind if the Thunderdome was really instituted…
October 1st, 2008 at 11:14 am
My two biggest gripes are: 1. The Politicians and all their speeches, bi-partisanship, egos, etc. I just roll my eyes at how important they try to sound. And to put a cherry on this, the Reps keep saying this is the most important bill to work on/pass in their lifetime. And what do they do? Go on recess. (roll eyes here).
2. All the news channels: Every news channel has a bunch of talking heads talking in all this financial chatter, blah blah blah. Just watching those channels will scare you to death. If it wasn’t the hurricanes that take you out, then it’s gas prices. If not gas, then the economy. It’s up to the point where I don’t watch anymore. Too much chatter.
The Thunderdome solution is the best solution. Strongest wins. We get entertained. win-win for all!
October 1st, 2008 at 11:51 am
Excellent post. I usually don’t get involved with other people about politics/economics/whatever the government happens to be up to, but I do have my thoughts.
This kind of stuff is what I like to read. And that whole television stunt that Bush pulled really pissed me off cause I was about to start watching a show that came on at that very moment. I’d much rather watch a show than to hear him rattle off about how we need to be giving a ton of money to a bunch of rich people.
October 1st, 2008 at 1:01 pm
Completely agree on all counts.
October 1st, 2008 at 1:07 pm
My issue comes with the trickle down…the upper echelon causes a panic and then suddenly I’m paying more money for EVERYTHING—gas, groceries, homegoods, rent, insurance…so forth and so on.
I don’t think a bailout is the answer, but I’m not savvy enough to know what the answer is. I just want to be able to afford to live—you’d think that wouldn’t be too much to ask.
October 1st, 2008 at 3:53 pm
Great post!…though you left one part out of the mortgage post. Yes, you shouldn’t bite off more than you can chew. However, it’s not just the borrowers fault. Remember, the lenders are the experts. The real estate prices (and rentals) were falsely inflated by the greedy lenders and investors who are a lot more knowlegeable than the buyer. If lenders gave traditional, fixed, full doc loans then the $150,000 home would be worth $170,000, instead of $350,000. This would keep homes what they were intended to be…HOMES, not falsely inflated investments. More people would have been able to qualify for a reasonably priced home. Also, what brokers don’t tell you is that your paying a higher rate because they’re shopping the loan for you or that you could have qualified for a better loan. Many of them also break Massachusetts law by placing people who were in good loans into bad loans. Now, we have people who had the right intentions in hot water. Their credit is now ruined, in some cases, retirement money used to try to stay afloat. Not only do they lose their homes, they have bad credit and will have a hard time renting a place. When a CEO screws up, he takes his 20 million and goes home. These former home owners could be screwed for life.
October 1st, 2008 at 6:45 pm
“Purchasing a 700 billion dollar stake in companies that are failing”
This is not the plan, and it’s this kind of incorrect characterization of it that is fomenting so much opposition. It’s BUYING the distressed mortgages from the companies that are failing. This saves a lot of people from being foreclosed, because it gives them time to catch up on payments/restructure… and in the end, some (like Jim Cramer) suggest the taxpayers will actually MAKE money. It’s also being described as the only way to get an accurate reading of the value of these mortgages.
October 1st, 2008 at 8:25 pm
@BonzoGal: Two men enter! One man leaves!
@KF Chud: The news skews. I completely agree.
@n0ia: Thanks. I normally don’t get involved either, but the presidential speech pissed me off enough that I couldn’t help it. I was waiting for the 3 easy payments part to come on the screen.
@Sarah: Of course you do. I stole the whole post out of your economics notebook. MUAH HA HA HA HA
@M-shel: If you’re not sure what will solve the problem, you would fit in with a lot of people who make a lot of money in DC.
@Doles: The availability of credit and the idea of “buy now, pay later” have become so deeply ingrained over the fifty years, that I’m not surprised.
@Geoff: I have to disagree. The original provisions of the plan called for the Treasury to secure an equity stake in companies that sold its bad debt to the government.
Even if that provision were struck from the plan, the government’s role is not to save people from being foreclosed on or to be a giant money making machine. The government is not a mortgage company, and it’s not a parent. It’s role isn’t to protect people or corporations from error. If granted that right, its inherent inefficiency will cause it to perform more poorly than a private company.
And who’s going to listen to Jim Cramer? Cramer once said about his hedge fund managing days, “What’s important when you are in that hedge-fund mode is to not do anything remotely truthful because the truth is so against your view, that it’s important to create a new truth, to develop a fiction.” (see the article in the WSJ) Does that sound like someone to trust? I don’t think so.
October 2nd, 2008 at 2:56 am
I find it very disconcerting that I live in Canada, and actually, quite far away from the rest of the country, hahaha, and I know more about the politics and general going-on’s of the US than I know about my own country. Now I don’t follow politics anyways, I don’t vote, and I stand by that decision as full-heartedly as someone stands by their decision to vote for this group or that. I don’t vote because I have no interest in it, I have no complaints about the government that justify myself complaining. I just find it very irksome that I know all this going on and people telling me “its the start of the next Great Depression!”. I somehow doubt that. First of all, what sparked the Great Depression? Do you think if the same thing happened now, would our economy be screwed like then? And like you said, real estate makes up less than 5% of the GDP. All hail the president for putting people on edge all to make it look like he’s on top of things and is paying attention, and not reading Superfudge. (ahhh, Family Guy)
Great post, Beard Man!
October 2nd, 2008 at 1:39 pm
I agree with your “buy now, pay later” statement. Imagine how much cheaper things would have to be without all this credit being extended.