<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Aqua Teen Hunger Bombs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/</link>
	<description>Helping You Through Right Now</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kerry</title>
		<link>http://www.dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-20557</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 13:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-20557</guid>
		<description>i agree; this is insanity.  especially if they were already up for 3 weeks!!!  twas a sad day for boston...and we're supposed to be the good intelligent ones...sometimes anyway...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree; this is insanity.  especially if they were already up for 3 weeks!!!  twas a sad day for boston&#8230;and we&#8217;re supposed to be the good intelligent ones&#8230;sometimes anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life as a Pronoun</title>
		<link>http://www.dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-19112</link>
		<dc:creator>Life as a Pronoun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 04:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-19112</guid>
		<description>Hmmm.  I guess my C reply does make it sound like class warfare.  I basically meant to say that the marketing could have better executed without the collateral damage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm.  I guess my C reply does make it sound like class warfare.  I basically meant to say that the marketing could have better executed without the collateral damage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life as a Pronoun</title>
		<link>http://www.dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-19111</link>
		<dc:creator>Life as a Pronoun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 04:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-19111</guid>
		<description>A. Bomb squad didn't know when they were put up.  So to them it could have been 5 minutes ago.
B. Maybe none of the other dopes in the other cities put their devices on infrastructure.  As a result, cities didn't see them as a risk and therefore didn't spend any resources on it.  Can't bill for something that didn't happen.
C. You're right, it's not about who makes more money.  It's about Turner having the financial means to notify the proper authorities, fill out the paperwork and pay whatever fees needed before putting up the devices.  It would have appeared the same to the average joe without inconviencing thousands of people who were just trying to get through their day.
D. Inaction to potentially risky situations gets your name on a monument in the middle of a big hole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A. Bomb squad didn&#8217;t know when they were put up.  So to them it could have been 5 minutes ago.<br />
B. Maybe none of the other dopes in the other cities put their devices on infrastructure.  As a result, cities didn&#8217;t see them as a risk and therefore didn&#8217;t spend any resources on it.  Can&#8217;t bill for something that didn&#8217;t happen.<br />
C. You&#8217;re right, it&#8217;s not about who makes more money.  It&#8217;s about Turner having the financial means to notify the proper authorities, fill out the paperwork and pay whatever fees needed before putting up the devices.  It would have appeared the same to the average joe without inconviencing thousands of people who were just trying to get through their day.<br />
D. Inaction to potentially risky situations gets your name on a monument in the middle of a big hole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-19040</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 02:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-19040</guid>
		<description>A. If these were real bombs, they would've blown up 3 weeks ago with no quick action by the authorities.  The items were in place for 3 weeks.

B. No other city in the nation made this into an issue to gain a cool 2 Million.

C. This is not class warfare.  People make more $$.  I don't care who put the signs up.

D. Overreactions over to minor issues have a chilling effect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A. If these were real bombs, they would&#8217;ve blown up 3 weeks ago with no quick action by the authorities.  The items were in place for 3 weeks.</p>
<p>B. No other city in the nation made this into an issue to gain a cool 2 Million.</p>
<p>C. This is not class warfare.  People make more $$.  I don&#8217;t care who put the signs up.</p>
<p>D. Overreactions over to minor issues have a chilling effect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life as a Pronoun</title>
		<link>http://www.dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-18964</link>
		<dc:creator>Life as a Pronoun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2007 06:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-18964</guid>
		<description>Sorry I have to disagree with you on this one.  Everyone keeps on saying the ads didn't look like bombs so they shouldn't have been a problem.  But what are bombs suppose to look like?  A couple of sticks of TNT with a ticking clock?  Maybe Wiki or Google has image we can compare it to.  Oh good, this device has 3 sticks while the device in Google has 4, we're safe.  Sorry that's not going to cut it when past conflicts around the world has seen bombs placed inside dolls, toys and other innocent looking objects.  Also, I can possibly see an overreaction to 1 device, but when there's a report of numerous devices on infrastructure around the city, alarm bells should be ringing.  Am I being paranoid?  Sure, maybe that's just me.

Also, do you have that much confidence in our country's ability to protect us from those who might want to harm us?  Yes?  No?  I don't.   I don't lose any sleep over it,  but I don't trust it.  But it makes me feel better that appropriate actions were taken the other day.  Past and present conflicts (Afganistan vs USSR, Vietnam vs US) have shown guerrilla warfare is effective against more powerful countries, so why should this be any different.  

And this incident has only possibly helped any terrorist want-a-be's.  As a terrorism non-pro looking at what happened the other day, I learned several things.  First, half of the population is now complacent about innocent looking objects so now I can put bombs in anything (even a copy of the devices) and claim some lives.  Secondly, I've now seen how the city officals responded in rerouting traffic (what got stopped where and what was sent where) which I can use to make secondary attacks more effective - a la the London attacks which hit the buses after an initial subway bomb.  Could the re-routes have been predicted?  Sure, but this confirms the routes.  Thirdly, I saw what resources were pulled where (police doing traffic duty, etc...) , leaving gaps in coverage.  I'm not sure what I would do with that info exactly, but I'm not a terrorist.

Am I being paranoid?  Sure, but then again I was born in a country (not the US for those of you playing the home game) that was actively at war to parents who had lived through numerous conflicts.  

And keep in mind these signs weren't put up for art's sake or something a fan put up.  They were ads for a large corporation whose CEO's bonus last year was more than what you and I will make in our lifetimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I have to disagree with you on this one.  Everyone keeps on saying the ads didn&#8217;t look like bombs so they shouldn&#8217;t have been a problem.  But what are bombs suppose to look like?  A couple of sticks of TNT with a ticking clock?  Maybe Wiki or Google has image we can compare it to.  Oh good, this device has 3 sticks while the device in Google has 4, we&#8217;re safe.  Sorry that&#8217;s not going to cut it when past conflicts around the world has seen bombs placed inside dolls, toys and other innocent looking objects.  Also, I can possibly see an overreaction to 1 device, but when there&#8217;s a report of numerous devices on infrastructure around the city, alarm bells should be ringing.  Am I being paranoid?  Sure, maybe that&#8217;s just me.</p>
<p>Also, do you have that much confidence in our country&#8217;s ability to protect us from those who might want to harm us?  Yes?  No?  I don&#8217;t.   I don&#8217;t lose any sleep over it,  but I don&#8217;t trust it.  But it makes me feel better that appropriate actions were taken the other day.  Past and present conflicts (Afganistan vs USSR, Vietnam vs US) have shown guerrilla warfare is effective against more powerful countries, so why should this be any different.  </p>
<p>And this incident has only possibly helped any terrorist want-a-be&#8217;s.  As a terrorism non-pro looking at what happened the other day, I learned several things.  First, half of the population is now complacent about innocent looking objects so now I can put bombs in anything (even a copy of the devices) and claim some lives.  Secondly, I&#8217;ve now seen how the city officals responded in rerouting traffic (what got stopped where and what was sent where) which I can use to make secondary attacks more effective - a la the London attacks which hit the buses after an initial subway bomb.  Could the re-routes have been predicted?  Sure, but this confirms the routes.  Thirdly, I saw what resources were pulled where (police doing traffic duty, etc&#8230;) , leaving gaps in coverage.  I&#8217;m not sure what I would do with that info exactly, but I&#8217;m not a terrorist.</p>
<p>Am I being paranoid?  Sure, but then again I was born in a country (not the US for those of you playing the home game) that was actively at war to parents who had lived through numerous conflicts.  </p>
<p>And keep in mind these signs weren&#8217;t put up for art&#8217;s sake or something a fan put up.  They were ads for a large corporation whose CEO&#8217;s bonus last year was more than what you and I will make in our lifetimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: digitaldarryl</title>
		<link>http://www.dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-18800</link>
		<dc:creator>digitaldarryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 04:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-18800</guid>
		<description>Signs Signs everywhere a sign.
After driving eight hours across McAmerica, I've come to the realization that eventually we won't be able to look at the goddamn moon itself without Ignignokt and Err flipping us the bird as hard as they possibly can.

And Ted color the world wierd Turner should have fucking known better.  Does it make me a pussy to have said out loud
Glad I didn't take the train today
when I saw the city of Boston shut fucking down because of a TV show that I've played in the backyahd being made into a movie's Guerrilla advertising?
Guerrilla anything in this country should only be of the McGilla flavor please.
Freedom isn't free, and if there were bombs instead of Mooninites, what would we be saying now?  THAT freedom ( the one of speech ) is what is important here, not the freedom to plant hoax devices that threaten panic, chaos, the four horseman and Metallica growing their hair back.
-d---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Signs Signs everywhere a sign.<br />
After driving eight hours across McAmerica, I&#8217;ve come to the realization that eventually we won&#8217;t be able to look at the goddamn moon itself without Ignignokt and Err flipping us the bird as hard as they possibly can.</p>
<p>And Ted color the world wierd Turner should have fucking known better.  Does it make me a pussy to have said out loud<br />
Glad I didn&#8217;t take the train today<br />
when I saw the city of Boston shut fucking down because of a TV show that I&#8217;ve played in the backyahd being made into a movie&#8217;s Guerrilla advertising?<br />
Guerrilla anything in this country should only be of the McGilla flavor please.<br />
Freedom isn&#8217;t free, and if there were bombs instead of Mooninites, what would we be saying now?  THAT freedom ( the one of speech ) is what is important here, not the freedom to plant hoax devices that threaten panic, chaos, the four horseman and Metallica growing their hair back.<br />
-d&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-18710</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 02:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-18710</guid>
		<description>If you don't see the difference between putting small signs up and blocking a highway with a billboard, then what can I say?

This causes a chilling effect.  If there are major fines and arrests because a couple of guys put up some (actually kinda cool) signs around this city, will other artists or anyone do the same?

It's doubtful.

When small actions carry major risk, they are less likely to be undertaken.  And if you need a permit to put up a sign, is it free speech?

Are you just arguing to make this post have the most comments ever?  I think it doesn't count if it's the two of us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t see the difference between putting small signs up and blocking a highway with a billboard, then what can I say?</p>
<p>This causes a chilling effect.  If there are major fines and arrests because a couple of guys put up some (actually kinda cool) signs around this city, will other artists or anyone do the same?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s doubtful.</p>
<p>When small actions carry major risk, they are less likely to be undertaken.  And if you need a permit to put up a sign, is it free speech?</p>
<p>Are you just arguing to make this post have the most comments ever?  I think it doesn&#8217;t count if it&#8217;s the two of us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-18706</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 02:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-18706</guid>
		<description>I don't get it.  What "essential liberty" did we "give up"?  Free speech?  Are we talking "Give me guerrilla marketing or give me death?" They weren't pulling people out of their cars and frisking them under "suspicion of mooninites."  I agree that the two "art students" shouldn't be held responsible for this.  But Ted Turner wouldn't be allowed to drop a 50 foot billboard in the middle of I93 without a permit because of the traffic issues it would cause.  Why is this any different?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get it.  What &#8220;essential liberty&#8221; did we &#8220;give up&#8221;?  Free speech?  Are we talking &#8220;Give me guerrilla marketing or give me death?&#8221; They weren&#8217;t pulling people out of their cars and frisking them under &#8220;suspicion of mooninites.&#8221;  I agree that the two &#8220;art students&#8221; shouldn&#8217;t be held responsible for this.  But Ted Turner wouldn&#8217;t be allowed to drop a 50 foot billboard in the middle of I93 without a permit because of the traffic issues it would cause.  Why is this any different?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-18703</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2007 01:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-18703</guid>
		<description>Yea, and if I was a fireman, I'd wear a oxygen tank into a burning building.  So what?

The key words here are "potentially explosive".  If this was such a security threat, why was Boston the only city to take the extremist route?  Are we smarter than the nation, dumber than the nation, or bigger pussies?

Franklin once said, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

When everything is a potential threat, everyone is a potential threat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, and if I was a fireman, I&#8217;d wear a oxygen tank into a burning building.  So what?</p>
<p>The key words here are &#8220;potentially explosive&#8221;.  If this was such a security threat, why was Boston the only city to take the extremist route?  Are we smarter than the nation, dumber than the nation, or bigger pussies?</p>
<p>Franklin once said, &#8220;They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.&#8221;</p>
<p>When everything is a potential threat, everyone is a potential threat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-18529</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 00:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dyers.org/blog/archives/2007/02/01/aqua-teen-hunger-bombs/#comment-18529</guid>
		<description>Look...the government listening in on our telephone conversations is invasion of privacy and a loss of our freedom - because it is explicitly forbidden by our Constitution and our "Illustrious Leader" seems to think that he is above the law.  This incident, however, doesn't bother me one bit.  I'm quite happy in knowing that there is someone out there attempting to keep my streets free of potentially explosive ANYTHINGS!  I don't care what it looks like.  I don't feel that my freedom has suffered one bit over this incident.  And, I guarantee that if YOU worked on the bomb squad, you would almost certainly "explode first, and ask questions later" even if it was a ketchup bottle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look&#8230;the government listening in on our telephone conversations is invasion of privacy and a loss of our freedom - because it is explicitly forbidden by our Constitution and our &#8220;Illustrious Leader&#8221; seems to think that he is above the law.  This incident, however, doesn&#8217;t bother me one bit.  I&#8217;m quite happy in knowing that there is someone out there attempting to keep my streets free of potentially explosive ANYTHINGS!  I don&#8217;t care what it looks like.  I don&#8217;t feel that my freedom has suffered one bit over this incident.  And, I guarantee that if YOU worked on the bomb squad, you would almost certainly &#8220;explode first, and ask questions later&#8221; even if it was a ketchup bottle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
